23rd – 26th AUGUST, 2023
Presenting Author - SANDEEP KUMAR REDDY
Total knee arthroplasty is a successful operation for relieving the pain of end- stage arthritis but
there is a reported dissatisfaction rate of 10-20% in various studies. One of the reasons for
persistent pain and early failure is rotational malalignment of the femoral component.Computer
assisted surgery (CAS) can help in accurately measuring the femoral external rotation and making
the appropriate distal femur resection. The objective of this study was to do a comparative
analysis of the relationship between correctable varus deformity in varus osteoarthritic knees
with the amount of femoral external rotation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty by
CAS and analyze the differences in this relationship between gap management and measured
resection techniques. Our study included 117 patients with 57 patients in group1 (gapmanagement
technique) and 60 patients in group 2 (measured resection technique). All patients
in both the groups underwent primary, cemented, cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty
(Aesculap Columbus) using CAS (B Braun Orthopilot 5.1) with sub- vastus approach by a single
surgeon.The amount of varus in extension, varus in flexion, correctable varus after soft tissue
release and femur external rotation were measured. TKA was performed by tibia first gapbalancing
technique in group 1 and by femur first technique in group 2. In group 1 the mean preoperative
varus in extension was 7.73 which was correctable to a mean of 2.19 . The mean
external rotation was 3.61.There was a positive correlation between correctable varus and
external rotation (r=0.180) which was statistically not significant (p=0.181).In group 2 the mean
pre-operative varus in extension was 8.59 which was correctable to a mean of 2.87. The mean
external rotation was 3.60.There was a positive correlation between correctable varus and
external rotation(r=0.133) which was statistically not significant (p=0.311).The comparison of
correctable varus showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups
(p=0.245). The comparison of external rotation showed no statistically significant difference
between the two groups (p=0.968). Our results show a positive correlation between the amount
of correctable varus and femur external rotation which is variable in different knees and hence a
different resection angle should be employed in each knee based on the anatomy. CAS can
consistently improve the accuracy of component alignment irrespective of the type of technique.
Asia Pacific Arthroplasty Society Incorporated